Skip to content

ISO/IEC 42005

What it is

ISO/IEC 42005:2025 gives guidance on assessing the impact of an AI system on people and society. Opencomplai carries it as the native target ISO_IEC_42005, with 20 requirements. Each row has a clause id, a title and a note in this project's own words describing the evidence we look for. The standard's text is not reproduced.

Does it apply to you

It is voluntary guidance. Nothing in it is a legal duty, and a team that runs an AI impact assessment can use it as a structure for that work. Two scope answers under framework_inputs.ISO_IEC_42005.scope take clauses out of the report when they do not fit your system.

How rows are decided

Each row carries an evidence class:

  • hybrid: a file or code convention in the repository points at evidence, and an attestation from you decides the row.
  • organisational: only an attestation decides the row.

A row with no evidence reads Missing or Unverified. A supporting probe only points at evidence and never lifts a row by itself.

Requirements

17 of 20 requirements are checked from evidence (target 15). The other 3 take an attestation only.

Requirement Title Evidence class Sources TTL days Review
ISO_IEC_42005:Clause 5.2 Documenting the process hybrid attestation: ISO_IEC_42005:Clause 5.2; artifact: iso_iec_42005.impact_assessment#5.2 (corroborating) 365 mapping not yet reviewed
ISO_IEC_42005:Clause 5.3 Integration with other organizational management processes organisational attestation: ISO_IEC_42005:Clause 5.3 365 mapping not yet reviewed
ISO_IEC_42005:Clause 5.4 Timing of AI system impact assessment hybrid attestation: ISO_IEC_42005:Clause 5.4; artifact: iso_iec_42005.impact_assessment#5.4 (corroborating) 365 mapping not yet reviewed
ISO_IEC_42005:Clause 5.5 Scope of the AI system impact assessment hybrid attestation: ISO_IEC_42005:Clause 5.5; artifact: iso_iec_42005.impact_assessment#5.5 (corroborating) 730 mapping not yet reviewed
ISO_IEC_42005:Clause 5.6 Allocating responsibilities hybrid attestation: ISO_IEC_42005:Clause 5.6; artifact: iso_iec_42005.impact_assessment#5.6 (corroborating) 365 mapping not yet reviewed
ISO_IEC_42005:Clause 5.7 Establishing thresholds for sensitive uses, restricted uses and impact scales hybrid attestation: ISO_IEC_42005:Clause 5.7; artifact: iso_iec_42005.impact_assessment#5.7 (corroborating) 365 mapping not yet reviewed
ISO_IEC_42005:Clause 5.8 Performing the AI system impact assessment organisational attestation: ISO_IEC_42005:Clause 5.8 365 mapping not yet reviewed
ISO_IEC_42005:Clause 5.9 Analysing the results of the AI system impact assessment organisational attestation: ISO_IEC_42005:Clause 5.9 365 mapping not yet reviewed
ISO_IEC_42005:Clause 5.10 Recording and reporting hybrid attestation: ISO_IEC_42005:Clause 5.10; artifact: iso_iec_42005.impact_assessment#5.10 (corroborating) 365 mapping not yet reviewed
ISO_IEC_42005:Clause 5.11 Approval process hybrid attestation: ISO_IEC_42005:Clause 5.11; artifact: iso_iec_42005.impact_assessment#5.11 (corroborating) 365 mapping not yet reviewed
ISO_IEC_42005:Clause 5.12 Monitoring and review hybrid attestation: ISO_IEC_42005:Clause 5.12; artifact: iso_iec_42005.impact_assessment#5.12 (corroborating) 90 mapping not yet reviewed
ISO_IEC_42005:Clause 6.2 Scope of the AI system impact assessment hybrid attestation: ISO_IEC_42005:Clause 6.2; artifact: iso_iec_42005.impact_assessment#6.2 (corroborating) 730 mapping not yet reviewed
ISO_IEC_42005:Clause 6.3 AI system information hybrid attestation: ISO_IEC_42005:Clause 6.3; artifact: iso_iec_42005.impact_assessment#6.3 (corroborating) 365 mapping not yet reviewed
ISO_IEC_42005:Clause 6.4 Data information and quality hybrid attestation: ISO_IEC_42005:Clause 6.4; artifact: iso_iec_42005.impact_assessment#6.4 (corroborating) 180 mapping not yet reviewed
ISO_IEC_42005:Clause 6.5 Algorithm and model information hybrid attestation: ISO_IEC_42005:Clause 6.5; artifact: iso_iec_42005.impact_assessment#6.5 (corroborating) 180 mapping not yet reviewed
ISO_IEC_42005:Clause 6.6 Deployment environment hybrid attestation: ISO_IEC_42005:Clause 6.6; artifact: iso_iec_42005.impact_assessment#6.6 (corroborating) 365 mapping not yet reviewed
ISO_IEC_42005:Clause 6.7 Relevant interested parties hybrid attestation: ISO_IEC_42005:Clause 6.7; artifact: iso_iec_42005.impact_assessment#6.7 (corroborating) 365 mapping not yet reviewed
ISO_IEC_42005:Clause 6.8.2 Benefits and harms hybrid attestation: ISO_IEC_42005:Clause 6.8.2; artifact: iso_iec_42005.impact_assessment#6.8.2 (corroborating) 365 mapping not yet reviewed
ISO_IEC_42005:Clause 6.8.3 AI system failures and reasonably foreseeable misuse hybrid attestation: ISO_IEC_42005:Clause 6.8.3; artifact: iso_iec_42005.impact_assessment#6.8.3 (corroborating) 365 mapping not yet reviewed
ISO_IEC_42005:Clause 6.9 Measures to address harms and benefits hybrid attestation: ISO_IEC_42005:Clause 6.9; artifact: iso_iec_42005.impact_assessment#6.9 (corroborating) 365 mapping not yet reviewed

Scaffolds

opencomplai scaffold writes a starting AI_IMPACT_ASSESSMENT.md with one marked section per clause. Each section holds a _fill in_ marker until you write it.

Timeline (none)

This pack has no timeline: a standard without legal application dates.

Gate in CI

Bash
opencomplai check --target ISO_IEC_42005 --gate ISO_IEC_42005 --gate-fail-on missing --repo-root .

The gate exits 1 when a row reads Missing.

What stays attested and why

Clauses 5.3, 5.8 and 5.9 concern how the organisation runs and governs its assessment process. No file in a repository shows that, so these rows take an attestation only.

Review status

The row mappings are this project's own, flagged low confidence: mapping not yet reviewed.

Disclaimer

This page describes what the tool checks. It is not an audit, certification or legal assessment. Percentages and counts are draft estimates.